Methods for Optimizing Bunch Distance of Fractured Horizontal Wells of Shale Gas

ABSTRACT

The present disclosure provides a method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas, which relates to the technical field of oil exploration. The method comprises first establishing a stress field distribution model for a single fracture; then establishing an induced stress distribution model of segmented single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; later establishing an induced stress distribution model of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; last optimizing fracturing parameters and fracture distance according to the distribution pattern of the induced stress difference. 
     The method considers the stress barrier, stress interference effects, and the variation of the effective net pressure during the synchronous expansion of fractures, so the calculation model is more in line with the actual working conditions, has higher precision, and can provide more accurate theoretical guidance for the optimization design of segmented multi-bunch fracturing of a horizontal well.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application claims the benefit of Chinese Patent Application No. Application No. 201910137958.8 filed on Feb. 25, 2019, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

TECHNICAL FIELD

The present disclosure relates to the technical field of oil exploration and is more particularly concerned with a method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas.

BACKGROUND

Shale gas has developed rapidly around the world, and its distribution area is also quite wide, showing the features of great developing potential. At present, shale gas resources have been found in such area as Bohai Gulf, Songliao, and Sichuan in China. According to related prediction and speculation, the total amount of shale gas resources in China would exceed 30×10¹² m³, which has enormous developing potential.

Shale gas reservoirs show the characteristics of low porosity, and the permeability of substrate is quite low. During the exploration of shale gas, fracture is the major technology and plays an important role in the development of shale gas.

SUMMARY

The present disclosure provides a method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas, comprising establishing a stress field distribution model for a single fracture; establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to previous fractured segment; calculating the induced stress between fractures inside a segment; calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to next fractured segment; calculating the horizontal induced stress difference of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; according to the induced stress difference, determining the optimal bunch distance.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the stress field distribution model for a single fracture is

$\left\{ {\begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h} = {p_{n}\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}} + \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{4\left( \sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}} \right)^{3}}} \right)}} \\ {\sigma_{H} = {2p_{n}{v\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2h}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}}} \right)}}} \end{matrix}\quad} \right.$

-   where σ_(h) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal     geostress direction of a fracture, MPa; -   σ_(H) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress     direction of a fracture, MPa; p_(n) is original net pressure in     fractures, MPa; a is the distance from the fracture center to a     measuring point, m; r is fracture half length, m; v is rock Poisson     ratio.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the induced stress distribution model of multi-segment single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well comprises: the actual net pressure inside the fracture of the Nth segment, i.e. effective net pressure

${p_{en}(N)} = {p_{n} - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}{\sigma_{h}^{i}(N)}}}$

where p_(en) (N) is the effective net pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; p_(n) is the original pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i)(N) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa.

The horizontal induced stress in the formation around the fracture of the Nth segment is

$\left\{ {\begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N} = {{p_{en}(N)}\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}} + \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{4\left( \sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}} \right)^{3}}} \right)}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N} = {2{p_{en}(N)}{v\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}}} \right)}}} \end{matrix}\quad} \right.$

where σ_(h) ^(N) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the Nth segment to the formation around the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the Nth segment to the formation around the Nth segment, MPa.

After the fracturing of the Nth segment, the total induced stress in the formation around the segment is obtained by superimposing the induced stresses generated by each segment fracture at the point:

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{\prime} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sigma_{h}^{i}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{\prime} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sigma_{H}^{i}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ′_(h) is the induced stress in the formation around the segment in the minimum horizontal geostress direction after the fracturing of the Nth segment, MPa; σ′_(H) is the induced stress in the formation around the segment in the maximum horizontal geostress direction after the fracturing of the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(i) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well comprises calculating the effective net pressure of the first fracture in the segment relative to previous fractured segment, calculating the effective net pressure of each fracture in the segment relative to the left- and right-side formation thereof, and calculating the effective net pressure of the last fracture in the segment relative to next fractured segment.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the multiple bunches are three bunches per segment, wherein the three bunches of fractures of the Nth segment are sequentially recorded as fractures N₁, N₂ , and N₃, Fracture N₁ is the fracture near the previous fractured segment, i.e. the (N−1)th fractured segment, Fracture N₃ is the fracture the furthest away from the (N−1)th fractured segment, Fracture N₂ is the fracture between fracture N₁ and fracture N₃.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the said multi-segment is segments of natural numbers equal to or greater than 3.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the effective net pressure of Fracture N₁ relative to the previous fractured segment is

p _(enl)(N ₁)=p _(n)−σ_(h) ^((n−1)) ³ (N ₁)

where p_(enl)(N₁) is the effective net pressure of Fracture N₁ relative to the left-side formation thereof, MPa; σ_(h) ^((N−1)3)(N₁) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the third perforated bunch (here take the example of 3 bunches per segment) of the (N−1)th fractured segment to Fracture N₁, MPa.

The induced stress generated at any point in this coordinate between Fracture N₁ and N₂ is

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} = {{P_{n}\frac{\sin \beta_{n1}}{2}\left( \frac{2l_{n1}}{r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} - {P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n1}\cos \beta_{n1}}{\left( {r_{n1}r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {{\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} = {2{{vP}_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n1}\cos \beta_{n1}}{\left( {r_{n1}r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ_(enh)(N₁, N₂) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₁ to Fracture N₂, MPa; β_(n1) is the angle of Fracture N₁ to a point in the right-side formation thereof; l_(n1) is the total length of Fracture N₁, m; r_(n1) is the half length of Fracture N₁, m; r_(n2) is the half length of Fracture N₂, m; σ_(enH)(N₁, N₂) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₁ to Fracture N₂, MPa.

The relationship between Fracture N₂ and N₃ is

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)} = {{P_{n}\frac{\sin \beta_{n2}}{2}\left( \frac{2l_{n2}}{r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} - {P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n2}\cos \beta_{n2}}{\left( {r_{n2}r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {{\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)} = {2v{P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n2}\cos \beta_{n2}}{\left( {r_{n2}r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ_(enh)(N₂, N₃) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₂ to Fracture N₃, MPa; β_(n2) is the angle of Fracture N₂ to a point in the right-side formation thereof; l_(n2) is the total length of Fracture N₂, m; r_(n2) is the half length of Fracture N₂, m; r_(n3) is the half length of Fracture N₃, m; σ_(enH)(N₂, N₃) the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₂ to Fracture N₃, MPa.

The effective net pressure of Fracture N₃ relative to the next fractured segment is

${p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} = {p_{n} - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}{\sigma_{h}^{i3}\left( N_{3} \right)}}}$

where p_(enr)(N₃) is the effective net pressure of Fracture N₃ relative to the right-side formation thereof, MPa.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the specific calculation of the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to previous fractured segment is as follows.

The induced stress outside a fracture inside the Nth segment adjacent to the previous fractured segment is:

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N_{1}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i}} + {\sigma_{h}^{N_{1}}\left\lbrack {p_{en}\left( N_{1} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N_{1}} = {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i}} + {\sigma_{H}^{N_{1}}\left\lbrack {p_{en}\left( N_{1} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ is the total induced stress at this point in the minimum horizontal geostress direction, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) ¹ is the total induced stress at this point in the maximum horizontal geostress direction, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(i) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ [P_(enl)(N₁)] is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the Nth segment to the left-side formation thereof, MPa; σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ [P_(enl)(N₁)] is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the Nth segment to the left-side formation thereof, MPa.

The induced stress between fractures of the Nth segment comprises the induced stress between Fracture N₁ and N₂

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{1} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{1} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1^{l}}N_{2}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ_(h) ¹ is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₁ and N₂, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i1) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the fractured ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(H) ¹ the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₁ and N₂ , MPa; σ_(H) ^(i1) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the ith fractured segment to the point, MPa.

The induced stress between Fracture N₂ and N₃ is

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{2} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{2} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ_(h) ² is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₂ and N₃, MPa; σ_(H) ² is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₂ and N₃, MPa.

The induced stress outside a fracture in the Nth segment adjacent to next fractured segment is

$\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N_{3}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i}} + {\sigma_{h}^{N_{3}}\left\lbrack {p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N_{3}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i}} + {\sigma_{H}^{N_{3}}\left\lbrack {p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$

where σ_(h) ^(N) ³ is the total induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) ³ is the total induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the horizontal induced stress difference Δσ of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well is

σ_(H)=σ_(H) ^(N) ¹ +σ_(H) ¹+σ_(H) ²+σ_(H) ^(N) ³ σ_(h)=σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ +σ_(h) ¹+σ_(h) ²+σ_(h) ^(N) ³ Δσ=σ_(H)−σ_(h)

where σ_(h) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by formation, MPa; σ_(H) the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by formation, MPa.

According to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, the position with the maximum induced stress difference is the optimal bunch distance.

The beneficial effects of the technical solution provided in the present disclosure are as follows.

1. According to the analysis of the stress barrier effects and the stress interference effects between fractures, it is found that fractures at different positions are subject to different stress and cannot be calculated simply by stress superposition. The stress of the first bunch of fracture and the last fracture in the segment should be calculated separately, and the stresses at the other bunches can be obtained by superposition.

2. The calculation model for segmented multi-bunch fracturing induced stress that considers the stress barrier, stress interference effects, and the variation of the effective net pressure during the synchronous expansion of fractures is more in line with the actual working conditions, has higher precision, and can provide more accurate theoretical guidance for the optimization design of segmented multi-bunch fracturing of a horizontal well.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF FIGURES

The accompanying figures show the exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and serve to explain the principles of this disclosure along with the description thereof, wherein these accompanying figures provide further understanding of this disclosure and are included in this specification and constitute part of the specification.

FIG. 1 is the flowchart of the method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 2 is a schematic view of bunches of a fractured horizontal well of shale gas according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 3 is a schematic view of the induced stress field geometric distribution of a single fracture according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of segmented single-bunch geometric distribution according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 5 is a schematic view of segmented multi-bunch geometric distribution according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure, wherein in the figure is the overall schematic view of 4 segments and 3 bunches.

FIG. 6 is a schematic view of 3 bunches in a segment of multiple segments and multiple bunches according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure.

FIG. 7 is the calculation results of induced stress difference according to at least an embodiment of the present disclosure.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The disclosure is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying figures and embodiments. It can be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are only used to explain related content, rather than limiting the disclosure. It should also be noted that, only the parts related to the present disclosure are shown in the figures for the convenience of description.

It should be noted that the embodiments in the present disclosure and the features in the embodiments can be combined with each other without conflict. The disclosure will be described in detail below with reference to the figures and embodiments.

A method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas should possess the following two features: 1. a geostress calculation model with appropriately considering existing fractures in formation after fracturing; 2. a set of stimulation method with appropriately calculating reservoir seepage conditions.

The present disclosure provides a method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas.

As shown in FIG. 1, the method comprises the following steps:

S1: establishing a stress field distribution model for a single fracture, i.e. a mathematical model of horizontal induced stress generated by a single fracture at a point in the horizontal wellbore direction, including the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction of the fracture and the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction of the fracture;

S2: establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well (when a horizontal well is fractured, multiple segments are fractured, and there is only a bunch per segment, which is called multi-segment single bunch);

S3: establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well, wherein taking the Nth-segment 3-bunch fracturing as an example, the three fractures of N₁, N₂ , and N₃ at the perforated bunch of the Nth segment extend synchronously during fracturing, and since the three fractures of N₁, N₂ , and N₃ are not formed in sequence, there are stress barrier and stress interference effects among the three fractures of the Nth fracturing segment;

S4: calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to previous fractured segment;

S5: calculating the induced stress between fractures inside a segment;

S6: calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to next fractured segment;

S7: calculating the horizontal induced stress difference of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well;

S8: according to the induced stress difference, determining the optimal bunch distance.

The following description will be made in conjunction with specific embodiments.

FIG. 2 shows a schematic view of shale gas fracturing horizontal well technique. In the figure, the horizontal well has 4 horizontal segments numbered sequentially 1-4 from left to right, and each segment has 3 bunches of fractures.

Step 1: establishing a stress field distribution model for a single fracture.

The geometrical distribution model of the induced stress field of a single fracture after shale gas fracturing is shown in FIG. 3. It is assumed that the cross section of the fracture is elliptical, the direction of the horizontal wellbore is the x-axis (the minimum horizontal geostress direction), and the direction of the fracture height is the z-axis (the direction perpendicular to the geostress direction). According to the theory of elastic mechanics, the model of horizontal induced stress generated a single fracture to a point on the x-axis at the position of a away from the fracture center is

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h} = {p_{n}\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}} + \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{4\left( \sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}} \right)^{3}}} \right)}} \\ {\sigma_{H} = {2p_{n}{v\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2h}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (1) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(h) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction of a fracture, MPa; σ_(H) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction of a fracture, MPa; p_(n) is original net pressure in fractures, MPa; a is the distance from the fracture center to a measuring point, m; r is fracture half length, m; v is rock Poisson ratio.

Step 2: establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well. When a horizontal well is fractured, multiple segments (N segments) are fractured and there is only a bunch per segment, which is called multi-segment single bunch). FIG. 4 shows a schematic view of a single bunch in 1, 2, 3 segments (only 3 segments are shown), i.e., only one bunch per segment.

However, the actual net pressure in the fracture of the Nth fractured segment, i.e., the effective net pressure is not the original net pressure, but the original net pressure minus the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fractures of the previous N−1 segments at the position of the fracture of the segment, i.e., the expression of the effective net pressure is

$\begin{matrix} {{p_{en}(N)} = {p_{n} - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}{\sigma_{h}^{i}(N)}}}} & (2) \end{matrix}$

where p_(en)(N) is the effective net pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; p_(n) is the original pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i)(N) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa.

At this point, the horizontal induced stress in the formation around the fracture of the Nth segment is obtained as

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N} = {{p_{en}(N)}\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}} + \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{4\left( \sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}} \right)^{3}}} \right)}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N} = {2{p_{en}(N)}{v\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (3) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(h) ^(N) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the Nth segment to the formation around the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the Nth segment to the formation around the Nth segment, MPa.

p_(n) in equation (1) is for a single fracture, that is, the initial condition is that only a fracture is fractured in the reservoir, and the original net pressure is also the effective net pressure. p_(en)(N) in equation (3) is the effective net pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment of segmented single-bunch fracture.

After the fracturing of the Nth segment, the total induced stress in the formation around the segment is obtained by superimposing the induced stresses generated by each segment fracture at the point:

$\begin{matrix} {\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{\prime} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sigma_{h}^{i}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{\prime} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sigma_{H}^{i}}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (4) \end{matrix}$

where σ′_(h) is the induced stress in the formation around the segment in the minimum horizontal geostress direction after the fracturing of the Nth segment, MPa; σ′_(H) is the induced stress in the formation around the segment in the maximum horizontal geostress direction after the fracturing of the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(i) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa.

Step 3: establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well.

Taking the fracturing of the Nth segment as an example, the three fractures of N₁, N₂, and N₃ at the perforated bunch of the Nth segment extend synchronously during fracturing. Since the three fractures of N₁, N₂, and N₃ are not formed in sequence, at this moment, there are stress barrier and stress interference effects among the three fractures in the Nth fracturing segment. The morphology of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing is shown in FIG. 5.

The effective net pressure of Fracture N₁ relative to the left formation is:

p _(enl)(N ₁)=p _(n)−σ_(h) ^((N−1)) ³ (N₁)   (5)

where p_(enl)(N₁) is the effective net pressure of Fracture N₁ relative to the left-side formation thereof, MPa; α_(h) ^((N−1)) ³ (N₁) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the third perforated bunch (here take the example of 3 bunches per segment) of the (N−1)th fractured segment to Fracture N₁, MPa.

When the horizontal well fracturing generates fractures, the fractures start fracturing along the direction perpendicular to the direction of the minimum stress and extend along the direction of the maximum major stress. After the distance between segments is fixed, the middle position between two segments is selected as the original point, the x-axis is the direction of the minimum horizontal major stress, the y-axis is the direction of the maximum horizontal major stress, and the cross section through the axis of the horizontal wellbore is selected. In a two-dimensional coordinate system, for the fractures of the ith segment, the induced stress generated at any point of this coordinate between Fracture N₁ and N₂ is

$\begin{matrix} {\quad{\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} = {{P_{n}\frac{\sin \beta_{n1}}{2}\left( \frac{2l_{n1}}{r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} - {P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n1}\cos \beta_{n1}}{\left( {r_{n1}r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {{\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} = {2v{P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n1}\cos \beta_{n1}}{\left( {r_{n1}r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.}} & (6) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(enh)(N₁, N₂) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₁ to Fracture N₂ , MPa; β_(n1) is the angle of Fracture N₁ to a point in the right-side formation thereof; l_(n1) is the total length of Fracture N₁, m; r_(n1) is the half length of Fracture N₁, m; r_(n2) is the half length of Fracture N₂m; σ_(enH)(N₁, N₂) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₁ to Fracture N₂, MPa.

Likewise, the induced stress generated at any point of this coordinate between Fracture N₂ and N₃ can be obtained as

$\begin{matrix} {\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)} = {{P_{n}\frac{\sin \beta_{n2}}{2}\left( \frac{2l_{n2}}{r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} - {P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n2}\cos \beta_{n2}}{\left( {r_{n2}r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {{\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)} = {2v{P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n2}\cos \beta_{n2}}{\left( {r_{n2}r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.} & (7) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(enh)(N₂, N₃) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₂ to Fracture N₃, MPa; β_(n2) is the angle of Fracture N₂ to a point in the right-side formation thereof; l_(n2) is the total length of Fracture N₂, m; r_(n2) is the half length of Fracture N₂, m; r_(n3) is the half length of Fracture N₃, m; σ_(enH)(N₂, N₃) the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₂ to Fracture N₃, MPa.

The calculation model for calculating the effective net pressure of the third fracture N₃ in the segment relative to the right-side formation thereof is

$\begin{matrix} {{p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} = {p_{n} - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}{\sigma_{h}^{i3}\left( N_{3} \right)}}}} & (8) \end{matrix}$

where p_(enr)(N₃) is the effective net pressure of Fracture N₃ relative to the right-side formation thereof, MPa.

Step 4: calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to previous fractured segment (Point A in FIG. 6). The calculation model is

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N_{1}} = {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i}} + {\sigma_{h}^{N_{1}}\left\lbrack {P_{enl}\left( N_{1} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N_{1}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i}} + {\sigma_{H}^{N_{1}}\left\lbrack {P_{enl}\left( N_{1} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (9) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ is the total induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) ¹ is the total induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(l) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment to the point, MPa; σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ [p_(enl)(N₁)] is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch in the Nth segment to the left-side formation thereof, MPa; σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ [p_(enl)(N₁)] is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch in the Nth segment to the left-side formation thereof, MPa.

The two parameters above can be obtained according to equation (3).

Step 5: calculating the induced stress between fractures inside a segment (Point B in FIG. 6). The calculation model is

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{1} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i1}} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{1} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i1}} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (10) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(h) ¹ is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₁ and N₂, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i1) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch in the ith fractured segment to the point, MPa; σ_(H) ¹ the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₁ and N₂ , MPa; σ_(H) ^(i1) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the ith fractured segment to the point, MPa.

The calculation model for calculating the induced stress between fractures inside a segment (Point C in FIG. 6) is

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{2} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{2} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i1}} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (11) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(h) ² is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₂ and N₃, MPa; σ_(H) ² is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₂ and N₃, MPa.

S6: calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to next fractured segment (Point D in FIG. 6). The calculation model is

$\begin{matrix} \left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N_{3}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i}} + {\sigma_{h}^{N_{3}}\left\lbrack {p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N_{3}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i}} + {\sigma_{H}^{N_{3}}\left\lbrack {p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right. & (12) \end{matrix}$

where σ_(h) ^(N) ³ is the total induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) ³ is the total induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa.

Although the embodiment takes three fractures as an example, the method provided by the present disclosure can be similarly applied to conditions of any fractures, and the repetitious details are not given here.

Step 7: calculating the horizontal induced stress difference of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well, wherein the position with the maximum induced stress difference among bunches is the optimal fracture distance. The calculation model is

σ_(H)=σ_(H) ^(N) ¹ +σ_(H) ¹+σ_(H) ²+σ_(H) ^(N) ³   (13)

σ_(h)=σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ +σ_(h) ¹+σ_(h) ²+π_(h) ^(N) ³   (14)

Δσ=σ_(H)−σ_(h)   (15)

where σ_(h) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by formation, MPa; σ_(H) the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by formation, MPa.

Step 8: according to the induced stress difference, determining the optimal bunch distance. The position with the maximum induced stress difference is the optimal bunch distance. Related curves can be drawn according to the induced stress difference, and the optimal bunch distance can be identified based on the distance between peaks and valleys of the curves.

As shown in FIG. 7, in the design scheme, the segment length of the horizontal well is 1000 m, and five segments are fractured, i.e. the distance between the center of the segments is 200 m. Taking three bunches in a segment as an example, when the calculated fracture half height is 30 m, the original net pressure is 15 Mpa, and the rock Poisson's ratio is 0.25, the stress diagram obtained based on the optimization method at the present disclosure shows that the optimal bunch distance is that N₁ is at 57 m, N₂ is at 100 m, and N₃ is at 142 m.

The above are preferred embodiments of the present disclosure. It should be noted that without departing from the principles of the present disclosure those skilled in the art can also make several improvements and embroideries, which should also be considered as the scope of the present disclosure. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for optimizing bunch distance of fractured horizontal wells of shale gas, characterized in that, the method comprises establishing a stress field distribution model for a single fracture; establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to previous fractured segment; calculating the induced stress between fractures inside a segment; calculating the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to next fractured segment; calculating the horizontal induced stress difference of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well; and according to the induced stress difference, determining the optimal bunch distance.
 2. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, the stress field distribution model for a single fracture is $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h} = {p_{n}\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}} + \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{4\left( \sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}} \right)^{3}}} \right)}} \\ {\sigma_{H} = {2p_{n}{v\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(h) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction of a fracture, MPa; σ_(H) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction of a fracture, MPa; p_(n) is original net pressure in fractures, MPa; a is the distance from the fracture center to a measuring point, m; r is fracture half length, m; v is rock Poisson ratio.
 3. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, the induced stress distribution model of multi-segment single-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well comprises: the actual net pressure inside the fracture of the Nth segment, i.e. effective net pressure ${p_{n}(N)} = {p_{n} - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}{\sigma_{h}^{i}(N)}}}$ where p_(en)(N) is the effective net pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; p_(n) is the original pressure in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i)(N) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment in the fracture of the Nth segment, MPa; the horizontal induced stress in the formation around the fracture of the Nth segment is $\quad{\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N} = {{p_{en}(N)}\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}} + \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{4\left( \sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}} \right)^{3}}} \right)}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N} = {2{p_{en}(N)}{v\left( {1 - \frac{\frac{a}{2r}}{\sqrt{\left( \frac{a}{2r} \right)^{2} + \frac{1}{4}}}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.}$ where σ_(h) ^(N) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the Nth segment to the formation around the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the N th segment to the formation around the Nth segment, MPa; after the fracturing of the Nth segment, the total induced stress in the formation around the segment is $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{\prime} = {\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N}\sigma_{h}^{i}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{\prime} = {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N}\sigma_{H}^{i}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ′_(h) is the induced stress in the formation around the segment in the minimum horizontal geostress direction after the fracturing of the Nth segment, MPa; σ′_(H) is the induced stress in the formation around the segment in the maximum horizontal geostress direction after the fracturing of the Nth segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment, MPa; σhd H^(i) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment, MPa.
 4. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that, the said establishing an induced stress distribution model of multi-segment multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well comprises calculating the effective net pressure of the first fracture in the segment relative to previous fractured segment; calculating the effective net pressure of each fracture in the segment relative to the left- and right-side formation thereof; and calculating the effective net pressure of the last fracture in the segment relative to next fractured segment.
 5. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, the multiple bunches are three bunches per segment, wherein the three bunches of fractures of the Nth segment are sequentially recorded as fractures N₁, N₂, and N₃, Fracture N₁ is the fracture near the previous fractured segment, i.e. the (N−1)th fractured segment, Fracture N₃ is the fracture the furthest away from the (N−1)th fractured segment, Fracture N₂ is the fracture between fracture N₁ and fracture N₃.
 6. The method according to claim 4, characterized in that, the said multi-segment is segments of natural numbers equal to or greater than
 3. 7. The method according to claim 5, characterized in that, the effective net pressure of Fracture N₁ relative to the previous fractured segment is p _(enl)(N ₁)=p _(n)−σ_(h) ^((N−1)) ³ (N₁) where p_(enl)(N₁) is the effective net pressure of Fracture N₁ relative to the left-side formation thereof, MPa; σ_(h) ^((N−1)) ³ (N₁) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the third perforated bunch (here take the example of 3 bunches per segment) of the (N−1)th fractured segment to Fracture N₁, MPa; the induced stress generated at any point in this coordinate between Fracture N₁ and N₂ is $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} = {{P_{n}\frac{\sin \beta_{n1}}{2}\left( \frac{2l_{n1}}{r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} - {P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n1}\cos \beta_{n1}}{\left( {r_{n1}r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {{\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} = {2v{P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n1}\cos \beta_{n1}}{\left( {r_{n1}r_{n2}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(enh)(N₁, N₂) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₁ to Fracture N₂, MPa; β_(n1) is the angle of Fracture N₁ to a point in the right-side formation thereof; l_(n1) is the total length of Fracture N₁, m; r_(n1) is the half length of Fracture N₁, m; r_(n2) is the half length of Fracture N₂, m; σ_(enH)(N₁, N₂) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₁ to Fracture N₂, MPa; the relationship between Fracture N₂ and N₃ is $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {{\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)} = {{P_{n}\frac{\sin \beta_{n2}}{2}\left( \frac{2l_{n2}}{r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{3}{2}}} - {P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n2}\cos \beta_{n2}}{\left( {r_{n2}r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {{\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)} = {2v{P_{n}\left\lbrack {\frac{r_{n2}\cos \beta_{n2}}{\left( {r_{n2}r_{n3}} \right)^{\frac{1}{2}}} - 1} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(enh)(N₂, N₃) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₂ to Fracture N₃, MPa; β_(n2) is the angle of Fracture N₂ to a point in the right-side formation thereof; l_(n2) is the total length of Fracture N₂, m; r_(n2) is the half length of Fracture N₂, m; h_(n3) is the half length of Fracture N₃, m; σ_(enH)(N₂, N₃) the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by Fracture N₂ to Fracture N₃, MPa; the effective net pressure of Fracture N₃ relative to the next fractured segment is ${p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} = {p_{n} - {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}{\sigma_{h}^{i3}\left( N_{3} \right)}}}$ where p_(enr)(N₃) is the effective net pressure of Fracture N₃ relative to the right-side formation thereof, MPa.
 8. The method according to claim 7, characterized in that, the specific calculation of the induced stress outside a fracture in a segment adjacent to previous fractured segment is as follows: the induced stress outside a fracture inside the Nth segment adjacent to the previous fractured segment is: $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N_{1}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i}} + {\sigma_{h}^{N_{1}}\left\lbrack {p_{enl}\left( N_{1} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N_{1}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i}} + {\sigma_{H}^{N_{1}}\left\lbrack {p_{enl}\left( N_{1} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ is the total induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) ¹ is the total induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment, MPa; σ_(H) ^(i) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracturing of the ith segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ [P_(enl)(N₁)] is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the Nth segment to the previous fractured segment, MPa; σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ [p_(enl)(N₁)] is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the Nth segment to the previous fractured segment, MPa; the induced stress between fractures of the Nth segment comprises the induced stress between Fracture N₁ and N₂ $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{1} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{1} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i\; 1}} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(h) ¹ is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₁ and N₂, MPa; σ_(h) ^(i1) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the ith fractured segment, MPa; σ_(H) ¹ the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₁ and N₂, MPa; σ_(H) ^(i1) is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by the fracture at the first perforated bunch of the ith fractured segment, MPa; the induced stress between Fracture N₂ and N₃ is $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{2} = {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i1}} + {\sigma_{er\iota h}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} + {\sigma_{enh}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{2} = {{\sum\limits_{j = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{j1}} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{1},N_{2}} \right)} + {\sigma_{enH}\left( {N_{2},N_{3}} \right)}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(h) ² is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₂ and N₃, MPa; σ_(H) ² is the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated between Fracture N₂ and N₃, MPa; the induced stress outside a fracture in Nth segment adjacent to next fractured segment is $\quad\left\{ \begin{matrix} {\sigma_{h}^{N_{3}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{h}^{i}} + {\sigma_{h}^{N_{3}}\left\lbrack {p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \\ {\sigma_{H}^{N_{3}} = {{\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{N - 1}\sigma_{H}^{i}} + {\sigma_{H}^{N_{3}}\left\lbrack {p_{enr}\left( N_{3} \right)} \right\rbrack}}} \end{matrix} \right.$ where σ_(h) ^(N) ³ is the total induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa; σ_(H) ^(N) ³ is the total induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction at the point, MPa.
 9. The method according to claim 8, characterized in that, the horizontal induced stress difference Δσ of segmented multi-bunch fracturing for a horizontal well is σ_(H)=σ_(H) ^(N) ¹ +σ_(H) ¹+σ_(H) ²+σ_(H) ^(N) ³ σ_(h)=σ_(h) ^(N) ¹ +σ_(h) ¹+σ_(h) ²+σ_(h) ^(N) ³ Δσ=σ_(H)−σ_(h) where σ_(h) is the induced stress in the minimum horizontal geostress direction generated by formation, MPa; σ_(H) the induced stress in the maximum horizontal geostress direction generated by formation, MPa.
 10. The method according to claim 9, characterized in that, the position with the maximum induced stress difference is the optimal bunch distance. 